On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:35:33AM -0600, Bill Cadier wrote:
>
> And wasn't the SR-71 actually supposed to have been the RS-71? The
> story I heard was that Lyndon Johnson erroneously referred to it as the
> SR-71 and so it was renamed that. Apparently we don't want to let on
> that our presidents can actually make mistakes :-)
I've heard that story, too. And though I don't know if it's true, I'll bet
there's at least someone on this list who can definitively confirm or deny
that.
Dave
--
+--David Oksner-----http://www.case.net/--+
|Horngren's Observation: (generalized) |
| The real world is a special case. |
[log in to unmask]
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *