Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>But most I liked this statement from Rumsfeld, if it is true, of course:
><<
>Rumsfeld, 72, seemed taken aback by the question and a murmur began
>spreading through the ranks before he silenced it. "Now, settle down,
>settle down," he said. "Hell, I'm an old man, it's early in the morning,
>and I'm gathering my thoughts here."
>
>and he is supposed to re-structure the military?
>he's ready for a retirement-home or a nursing-home.
>Why can't politicians retire at 65 or 68 at the latest?
>
>Michael

Well, if politicians had a mandatory retirement at age 68, that would have
disqualified your "precious" John Kerry (age 72) from running in the last
election. Probably Ted Kennedy, Joe Lieberman, Dick Gephardt and a host of
others would be disqualified too.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *