HP3000-L Archives

November 2004, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:15:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Heard on radio by local announcer this morning (paraphased):

If Al-Qaeda were having an election for the chief
terrorist, either Osama bin Laden or Al-Zarqawi.

And Americans were polled as to "Which one they'd prefer?"
What would be American's feelings one way or the other?

(The announcer said in so many words,) that was about
the same amount of relative thought terrorists put
into Bush or Kerry.)

- - - - - - - - - - -

That pithy radio statement still left some questions
in my mind:

What would be the result?

And would it influence an Al-Qaeda election?

BT

-------------------------

I would vote for NOTA (None Of The Above).

Of course Al-Qaeda does not have to worry about having elections.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2