Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:23:57 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Tracy Pierce <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, Shawn, you can say anything you want with statistics.
>
> When Richie Rich pays 1% of his $10million income, that's a lot more than
> the 35% of my $100k that I pay. So yep, he's covering more of the tax
> burden.
After listening to the list... I figure it comes down to this.
If you think that taxes are required to help pay for the burden of Government
infrastructure, i.e. common defense, police, fire department etc...
Consider yourself a fiscal conservative.
If you think that taxes are to spread the wealth, i.e. rob from Peter (Bill
Gates) to pay someone who doesn't have a job, doesn't want a job, wouldn't even
consider looking for a job.... well that's liberal.
-Craig
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|