HP3000-L Archives

September 2004, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Paden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Glenn Paden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:10:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
I have no doubt that the absence of freedom is a prime motivator for the use
of terrorism unfortunately one's freedom very often is in conflict with
another's freedom. There must be some way in the clash of freedoms can be
resolved. GWB and company I suspect we're attempting to try a different
approach (as you pointed out) however attacking Iraq didn't and doesn't in
any way resolve the clash of freedoms which is the source of conflict in the
Middle East.

Terrorism is a strategy and because of that war cannot be declared on it and
it cannot be defeated. Terrorism is not a person, group of people nor a
country. Action can be taken against the use of terrorism and the people and
groups that use it however those actions must include much more than the
military force.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wonsil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: RE: [HP3000-L] Observation

Glenn wrote:
> You didn't answer the point made. The point being that terrorism can be a
> very difficult to fight and Israel, as an example, has fought
> for many years and the fight has not yet been won.

Ironically, this might put Glenn in a dangerous agreement with President
Bush who recently said this about the war on terror:

"I don't think you can win 'it'.  But I think you can create conditions so
that
the -- those who use terror as a tool are -- less acceptable in parts of
the world."

During the 9-11 hearings, there was a common theme coming from Powell and
Rice in that they didn't want to fight terrorism by matching strike with
strike.  This is what Israel has done for years and it leads to this
Hatfield/McCoy never-ending kind of feud.  Indeed, the administration *is*
taking a different approach to terrorism than the US has done in the past.

IMHO, one of the primary conditions that leads to terrorism is the absence
of freedom.  For any people under oppression, the cost of terrorism becomes
worth the price - not only acceptable in price but even honorable.  Contrary
to the opinion of some, freedom is the natural human condition and people
from all over the world yearn it.  Unfortunately, giving freedom to some
means taking control from others and you can end up with a fight on your
hands, as we have in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The people fighting the new
Afghani and Iraqi governments and coalition troops are not fighting for the
freedom of these people but for their own control.  The Palestinians are not
free, not only from Israel but from their own 'government'.  The Israelis
are not free because of the constant threat to their existence they live
under.  This is a perfect recipe for terrorism and these are the conditions
we need to change.

Mark W.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2