Donna,
My vote is, no matter what, Eloquence should be added to Image's Sig.    I
also believe that Sig Image needs seperate representation for one more
year.   If HP may see a SIG merger as a sign that our issues don't have
the backing from the user community to keep the SIG running.    Just my
point of view.

Lendy Sanford Cooke
Smurfit-Stone Container

The opinion express here is not necessarily that of Smurfit-Stone
Container Corporation.

"We are not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us;  we are
wondering how painful the best will turn out to be.  C.S.Lewis"

>  In article <[log in to unmask]>, donna garverick
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> <snip>
>>
>>- should sig image merge with sig mpe?
>
> To me merging all the HP3000/MPE SIG's makes sense, as most issues now
> are going to be about maintenance, and issues related to support and
> what HP will or wont be doing pre/post 2006
>
>
>>- should sig image include eloquence users and become sig
>>image/eloquence?
>
> Again my personal opinion is that this would be confusing, one product
> is evolving and changing the other isn't. Whilst externally they provide
> the same/very similar functionality, fundamentally they are completely
> different. I think the issues of those staying with TurboImage will be
> different from those who have migrated to Eloquence. As will be the
> response from their Vendors.
>
>
>
>>- any other suggestions?
>>
>
> As was suggested at HP World, should there be "SIG STAY", "SIG GO" and
> maybe "SIG DONT KNOW"  :-)
>
> --
> Alan Yeo
> [log in to unmask]    Just because you're paranoid
> Phone +44 1684 291710   it doesn't mean someone isn't!.
> Fax   +44 1684 291712
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *