HP3000-L Archives

March 2004, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bruce Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:47:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Of course the question that isn't asked, is "Do we have any proof that
Saddam Hussein, actually has any weapons of mass destruction at the time
these questions were asked?", and the answer is No.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Mc Coy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:57 PM
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT:Fw: Shalikashvili Made Case For War In Iraq


RNC
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:00 PM
Subject: From The Archives... Shalikashvili Made Case For War In Iraq


            From The Archives...
            An Elephant Never Forgets!

            IN 2002, GENERAL JOHN SHALIKASHVILI  MADE CASE FOR IRAQ WAR TO
SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE. "In the case of Iraq, there are, for me,
three first order questions. Do weapons of mass destruction in the hands of
Saddam Hussein pose a grave danger to us and to our friends and allies,
particularly those in the Middle East, but also in Europe? To me the answer
is clearly yes. Second, if in the end we are unable to eliminate these
weapons of mass destruction, and any and all means to produce more, if we
are unable to do so through tough, unfettered inspections or other
non-military means, would use of force to accomplish this be the right thing
to do? Again, my answer is yes. And question three, in my mind, has to do
with timing. Since the threat posed by these weapons in the hands of Saddam
Hussein has existed for some time, what has changed to create this new sense
of urgency? Here I believe that Secretary Rumsfeld has it right; what has
changed is 9/11 and our new realization of just how vulnerable we are to
terrorist attacks, and the catastrophic damage terrorists with weapons of
mass destruction could inflict on the United States." (John Shalikashvili,
Hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, 9/23/02)


            A Publication from the RNC Research Department

                        Paid for by the Republican National Committee.
                        Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate
Committee.
                        310 First Street SE, Washington, DC 20003 -
www.gop.com



                  Unsubscribe




* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2