Well, I can see we're not going to resolve this anytime soon. Just put me
down in the A-ABB category. That would be ALMOST-Anybody but Bush.
Alas, for me, this pretty much makes Kerry a default vote. I just thank
Providence that we're not looking at another Clinton running. If we were
expecting a GWB vs HRC vote in November, I'd be waiting for the sky to open
up and a Voice from Heaven saying "OK! THAT'S ENOUGH! YOU'RE ALL GOING IN
THE TIME OUT CHAIR!"
-----Original Message-----
From: Brice Yokem [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: More Raw Meat
Mr Gates -
--------------
Question, how can being against Mr. Bush's re-selection be construed as
'supporting terrorists'?
--------------
Because the alternative is seen as being soft on terrorism.
--------------
Dude, I just don't like the way the guy and his staff are running the
country. Blame whom you want, but before, Mr. Bush took over, I wasn't
doing half bad. Since---It's a struggle to keep the lights on. Whether or
not that is Mr. Bush's fault, I want to see what somebody else can do.
--------------
Can you say 'NAFTA'? This started long before 'W' took office, and had
bi-partisan support.
--------------
I also did not agree with the war in Iraq. I still think it was the wrong
thing for America to do, in spite of any advertised appreciation of our
action by the Iraqi citizens. There are many ruthless despots in the
world, I do NOT happen to think it's the U.S. Army's job to act as dictator
exterminators.
--------------
I am not entirely satisfied with the job he is doing either, but even less
satisfied withthe alternative.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
