HP3000-L Archives

March 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:59:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
Gilles wrote:
>I still think that this and other inconveniences would discourage me from
>using user volumes in an environment already protected by hardware mirroring.

While I agree, hardware mirroring is 100 times better than stand alone discs, and at 
least 50 times better than software mirroring, it is not a one size fits all issue. 

IMHO the important factor is the worst case amount of down time required to re-install 
and/or restore, plus any amount of lost data back to the store set timestamp. 
(Assuming no image logging or mirrored systems)

While MPE/iX is a very stable OS, it still has various issues that may result in a re-install
situation. (see my previous post re SR 8606351808). Also, let's not forget 'human errors', 
turning off  the wrong rack of discs, pulling the wrong cable, and so on.

I also agree that having a multiple volume set system is more inconvenient, but it certainly
can make a re-install far less painful, in the case of a 13 LUN system a small fraction in terms 
of total cost of unplanned down time and lost data.

Mike Hornsby Co-founder/Chief Technical Officer
Beechglen Development Inc. (beechglen.com)
513-922-0509 [log in to unmask]






----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gilles Schipper 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] A couple of disk questions


Well said by John.

I'd add one minor disclaimer.

Backups and restores ARE different when dealing with user volumes.

Assuming that you include the ;DIRECTORY option on your backup, you would
need to also include:

;onvs=mpexl_system_volume_set,uservol1,uservol2,...

On any future system install, you would need to re-create the user volume
set environment with VOLUTIL and restore the properly-stored directories
from backup before initiating the restore.

I still think that this and other inconveniences would discourage me from
using user volumes in an environment already protected by hardware mirroring.



At 01:24 PM 2004-03-10, John Clogg wrote:
>One of the main benefits of private volumes is fault isolation.  If a disk
>drive in a private volume set were to fail, you would only need to restore
>that volume set, rather than doing a complete install of the whole
>system.  Since you have mirrored arrays, that benefit diminishes in
>importance.  I don't find system administration to be enough more
>difficult with private volumes to even consider as a factor.  About the
>only consideration is creating and deleting groups.  For each group you
>create you have to do two NEWGROUP commands - one to add the group to the
>system directory, and one for the volume set directory.  There are command
>files available on Jazz that automate that extra step for you, if you find
>that problematic.  Backups and restores are no different with private
>volume sets.
>
>Yes, you can manipulate class names without a reload.  Others have already
>provided instructions.
>
>Regarding maintenance of your Nikes, you have three choices:  (1) HP will
>probably still support them on a time and materials basis, (2) You can get
>a maintenance agreement with a third-party support organization, or (3)
>Stock you own set of spares.  In my opinion, the best answer is either
>number 2 or a combination of 1 and 3.  In other words, have spare drives
>available to replace any that fail, and pay T&M charges if a more involved
>repair is needed.
>
>One more thing I want to comment on: Craig characterized XM as a write
>cache.  I disagree.  XM is essentially a log of physical transactions in
>progress, whose purpose is to allow the reversal of incomplete
>transactions in the event of a system failure.  Disc caching happens
>regardless of whether you have XM enabled or not.  If having multiple
>instances of XM does anything for performance, it's because of increased
>parallelism and less frequent checkpoints.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gilles Schipper
GSA Inc.
HP System Administration Specialists
300 John Street, Box 87651   Thornhill, ON Canada L3T 7R4
Voice: 905.889.3000     Fax: 905.889.3001
email:  [log in to unmask]  web: http://www.gsainc.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2