I was guessing that Mika saw the whole original issue (gay marriages), as
well as its potential branch-threads, as worthy of debate only among a
certain group of people. I concur :-)

Bjorn

Reef Fish wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:27:29 +0800, Bjorn Vang Jensen
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Michael Doelle wrote:
>>
>>>> The new possibilities seem endless.  Wotdayya fink?<
>>>
>>> I fink that this is an appropriate thread for the knuckledraggers
>>> over on rec.scuba.
>>
>> Ditto.
>>
>> Bjorn
>
> Bjorn und Michi,
>
> Not that I am a faithful reader of rec.scuba threads, but I am quite
> sure the subject of marrying a dog is still VIRGIN territory there.
>
> It's sort of a corollary to the topic "is SEX required in a
> "marriage" and other theological issues though.  0")
>
> -- Bob.