Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:37:06 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C3E5DC.7CECB7C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A400 MPEix 7.0.
=20
I have a couple of line printers currently connected via DTC48.
I have a DTC16ix already configured to replace the DTC48, but also have =
jet direct boxes available for these printers.=20
One way or the other the data all go over the network whether 3000-DTC =
or 3000-jetdirect via IP.
The Serial portion of the path is the obvious limiting factor for print =
speed, but the datacomm is faster than the printer.
=20
I'm wondering about network performance, spooler reliability et al DTC =
vs Network Printers.
Packet size to DTC vs to JetDirect?
Anybody got any thoughts?
------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C3E5DC.7CECB7C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">A400 =
MPEix=20
7.0.<?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"=20
/><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: =
yes"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">I have =
a couple=20
of line printers currently connected via =
DTC48.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">I have =
a DTC16ix=20
already configured to replace the DTC48, but also have jet direct boxes=20
available for these printers. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">One way =
or the=20
other the data all go over the network <SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>whether 3000-DTC or =
3000-jetdirect via=20
IP.</P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">The =
Serial=20
portion of the path is the obvious limiting factor for print speed, but =
the=20
datacomm is faster than the printer.</SPAN></P><o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: =
yes"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">I=92m =
wondering=20
about network performance, spooler reliability et al DTC vs Network =
Printers.</SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">Packet =
size to=20
DTC vs to JetDirect?</SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: =
yes"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </P>
<P class=3DMsoAutoSig style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-no-proof: yes">Anybody =
got any=20
thoughts?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C3E5DC.7CECB7C0--
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|