HP3000-L Archives

January 2004, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Berkowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Berkowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:36:30 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Gary Jackson writes

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Jackson [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Patch Digest oddities


Fellow listers-

I have noticed a few strange things about the ITRC patch digests, and I
wondered if anyone else had experienced the same thing.

1.  I THINK that I have subscribed to the MPE 7.5 patch digest.  But I
have
never received one.  Has anyone ever received a 7.5 patch digest?

2.  In the 7.0 patch digest that was sent yesterday, there were two
patches
mentioned, both for HP STORE.  The second one mentioned (MPEMXB6A)
appears
to have been superceded by the first patch mentioned (MPEMXK1B) by
several
iterations.  Doesn't it seem odd that both patches, one superceding the
other, would be mentioned in the same digest?  A curious mind wants to
know.

Gary Jackson
QSS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've been getting the 7.5 digest for quite sometime.  Probably have to
call the response center and have them really make you get it.  

Both patches are mentioned with different patch status.  The new one
says "Patch is General Release", while the other says "Patch is General
Superseded".  So you know who replaces who.

Mike Berkowitz
Guess? Inc.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2