This seems to be a recurring theme lately, of smearing the poster
or the post, with a label.

- Summary judgment and dismissal as ridiculous, the originator's post
after only reading two paragraphs.

- Summary judgment and dismissal as meaningless, the originator's posts.

On this last thread I thought a definite point was made (whether I
agree with it or not,) it used as few words as possible.  It also
imparted rather significant meaning to a potential terror recipient.

Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred White [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:05 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Improved Security?
> 
> 
> On Monday, December 22, 2003, at 09:17  PM, Denys Beauchemin wrote:
> 
> > Let me assure you that the terrorists will not make any distinction
> > between agnostic and atheist or any other type of infidel for that
> > matter.
> 
> That's what I like about your emails. They're so devoid of meaningful
> content.
> 
> FW

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *