Cool....
>> ! A liberal "pet" issue that can be thrown back in their face!)
When did this become 'us' vs. 'them'? And who, exactly are these 'us'
and them'?
Bring it on...my flame_suit just got back from the cleaners...]:-)))
Al Karman
Director of Information Technology
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Tim Cummings
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: 10 Commandments
1) The left is sure trying to make it that way. Look at the
officer in
the military who was being asked to resign for making religious remarks.
2) It would be a problem because it would be "discrimination"( I love
it! A
liberal "pet" issue that can be thrown back in their face!)
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Cagle [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: 10 Commandments
Tim Cummings wrote:
> The problem is now that one is required not to practice religion in
order
to
> be involved in government (at least Christianity anyhow).
1) This is obviously not true, given the public statements of the
current administration.
2) If it *was* true, why would it be a problem?
- Greg
--
Greg Cagle
gregc at gregcagle dot com
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
