Let me see if I can help you with this. Your original statement reads:
Usually, the intolerance that I am intolerant of is triggered, not by
people who don't think the way I do, but rather by people who don't
think at all."
If you simply change the word "triggered" to the word "found" and the
two occurrences of the word "by" to the word "in", the statement is
eminently more sensible.
Usually, the intolerance that I am intolerant of is found, not in people
who don't think the way I do, but rather in people who don't think at
all.
Don't you think? :)
Denys
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of fred White
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Enlightenment?
On Sunday, November 23, 2003, at 07:49 PM, Denys Beauchemin wrote:
> You are saying the intolerance triggered by people who do not think,
is
> the one you can't tolerate.
I didn't say that at all AND I didn't use the word "one".
>
> Doesn't make sense.
Few writings make sense when they are misread.
FW
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|