HP3000-L Archives

November 2003, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:46:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 05:22  PM, Tracy Pierce wrote:

> While I agree that some of the mentioned benefits should be extended
> to all
> citizens, I don't see them all as rights; I see specific privileges
> being
> granted to those who choose to marry and are thus more likely to
> procreate
> more "good" little Americans.  I'm neither gay (downtrodden!) nor
> married
> (privileged).  Where should I stand?

I agree with you there. I've NEVER thought that there should be marital
benefits other than the legal rights referencing property divisions and
care decisions.

However, I don't see those "benefits" (as well as the tax benefits)
ever being repealed. Consequently, disallowing same sex marriages is
prejudicial to gays and lesbians.

It appears that that's the only way for them to achieve a modicum of
"equality".

FW

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2