Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:53:14 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe you are referring to the case where the Supreme Court declared
the Texas sodomy law to be unconstitutional. In fact, the Supreme Court
should have passed on that case. These laws were being taken off the
books in various places and would have disappeared on their own. The SC
went out of its way to take this one and by doing so, opened a huge can
of worms. The remedy to a small, disappearing problem, created a huge
problem.
Denys
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Bill Shanks
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Enlightenment?
And rightfully so. Even that right-leaning Supreme Court had to make
the
right decision in that case.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|