David Strike wrote:

> It is/was a membrane suit and theoretically allowed the wearer
> to vary the amount and type of undergarments worn in accordance with the
> temperature.  I say 'theoretically' because it's greatest drawback was
that
> it was a neck-entry suit, with the neck-seal, (and optional attached latex
> hood) held in place by an oval metal ring and clamp.

I've got the general idea, but I'm having a bit of trouble picturing the
specifics.  We're well into a subject that I am not only ignorant of, but
never thought I'd care to be otherwise.  I've surely got some research to
do.  My curiosity is in full swing.

> Three types of under-garments were issued; the first was similar to
thermal underwear that
> mountain climbers wear - I got Sylvia to dye mine purple and add primrose
> piping!

Ever the risk taker.  I can't imagine being brave enough to be seen on one
of  Her Majesty's ships in such attire.  After a month or so at sea, I would
expect to have to be very careful not to drop the soap lest I make the
mistake of bending over to pick it up.  8^)

> Nevertheless, they were extremely comfortable to wear; well and close-cut,
> and easily maintained and repaired with nothing more complex than a
bicycle
> tyre repair outfit!  :-)

Did this suit fit so closely because it was custom made or because it was
made to stretch, or do I misunderstand again?  I'm actually picturing
something that fits like a wetsuit but seals at the wrists and neck,
something that stretches to accomodate the additional layers rather than
fitting so loosely that they easily fit inside.  Am I on the right track?

Lee