John Burke wrote:

> Obviously I'm not going to change anyone's mind, but I think Interex might
> consider whether it is exposing itself to legal liability by discriminating
> among attendees - who all paid the same amount of money to attend.
>
> Silliness, silliness, silliness.

Ah, but you repeat yourself 8^).

What kind of "legal liability" are you thinking of? I'm having a hard
time coming up with anything as I think about it. Remember also
that Interex is not the only party involved here, and if you're
planning on suing somebody you'll have to take on Encompass and
HP as well. I understand HP has some pretty good lawyers 8^).

You may not be aware of this, but HP has a long history of "secret
suites" and other exclusive customer sessions at the conference.
This is no different, just more formalized. For example, for many
years there was a "VIP customer reception" - in fact, the one
in San Francisco was where many of us met Carly for the first time.
Doesn't that fall into the same category? Where are you going to
draw that line?

Sorry, but I think you're overreacting here.

- Greg
--
Greg Cagle
gregc at gregcagle dot com

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *