On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 02:43:34 -0400, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>Anyone want to vote for blocking posters from fake addresses?

>The last person who blocked people's posts because he
>did not like them is why we're here in the first place.

Lee has got HISTORY wrong too.  The person who got us here was
NOT blocking people's posts because he did not like them.
He was the LIST OWNER censoring posters because he made up
rules arbitrarily about use of WORDS for his censorship!
He called them "strikes", and then did NOT enforce his own
rules uniformly, and only on those whom he dislike!

Get your FACTS straight, Lee!

The FACTS are in the archives.


>ust like before,
>you have only a few choices other than censorship, read or don't read,
>lock or don't block, respond or don't respond.

Just like Chuck, besides being the only TWO in Scuba-SE who brags
about putting me on their kill-file, and called me an "asshole",
Lee doesn't know the meaning of "censorship" from a hole in the
ground, and is essentially equating

                        CENCORSHIP

to

         traffic cop who arrests someone with a FAKE LICENSE


That's NOT censorship, Lee!  Sheeesh, and Lee brags about working
for the US government too.  ;-)   Just as ignorant as the
minimum-wage, no-high-school-education-required TSA employees
working for the US government in the airports!

The airport RULE enforcement of requiring one to have a valid
pictured ID is not one of censorship either.  That's much more
like the parallel proposed by some of barring posters KNOWN
to be using fake posting names when they are KNOWN to have
real names or real posting names in everyday use!

-- Bob.