HP3000-L Archives

April 2003, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Carol Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:37:33 -0500
Reply-To:
Carol Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
I'm thinking (perhaps incorrectly) that the same code is running correctly
on the normal box, and that this problem only appeared when the application
was restored on the DR box.   Just for grins - was the restored database on
a private volume set - one set up for the disaster recovery, when the
normal application database does not reside in such a set?  If so, you
might be tripping over yet another little gotcha - the UV capability.
Again - if Query is working, and it's the same physical COBOL code,
associated XLs, and databases just plopped on the DR box, then I keep going
back to environmental differences that are independent of the IMAGE calls.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2