HP3000-L Archives

March 2003, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:12:26 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 02:34 PM, Cortlandt Wilson wrote:

> Joseph Rosenblatt wrote:
>> This story has been shown to be true. I am still left with these
>> questions.
>> 1. Because the story is true does it make question attributed to
>> Canterbury or the answer attributed to Powell any less arrogant?
>
> Arrogant by what standard?  It appears fair in your book to call others
> arrogant and disingenous.   In my opinion your freely calling others
> "arrogant"  indicates that you are at least as much of an arrogant
> bastard.
> That is my knee-jerk reaction anyway.  As far as I can see my reaction
> to
> you is as well or better grounded than is yours of Powell.
>
>> Let Peace be the maxim by which we act because we will Peace to
>> become a
>> universal law.
>
> Joseph, I don't understand this language of personal attack.  You keep
> repeating that phrase about peace yet your words read to me more as a
> hypocrite than a man of peace.  If peace relied on your words then I
> think
> we are all sunk.
>
> I say that peace begins with expressing ourselves in a fair and
> productive
> manner.

Like by calling someone an "arrogant bastard"? Or a "hypocrite"?

FW

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2