> -----Original Message-----
  > From: Tom Brandt
  >
  > At 10:00 PM 3/24/2003 -0500, Wirt Atmar wrote:
  > >Fred writes:
  > >
  > > >  His article may be legally valid (who am I to contradict
  > > > him?) but governments are seldom bound by legal restraints.
  > > > And they don't need to legally prove their beliefs that
  > > > some other nation/regime poses a threat that they must
  > > > thwart by preemptive actions.
  > >
  > > I've known Fred and Eugene both for over 20 years -- and I
  > > just about split the difference in their ages. However, if
  > > I were to vote blindly, without being given the chance to
  > > hear either one of their opinions beforehand, I'd vote with
  > > Fred every time. Fred's instincts are generally a lot better
  > > honed than Eugene's. Eugene simply has a better pulpit for
  > > the moment, but that shouldn't be given too much weight.
  >
  > Well-honed instincts or not, Eugene's and his
  > co-conspirators' weblog can
  > be read at http://volokh.blogspot.com/
  >
  > He mentioned me once, so his instincts can't be that bad :)
  >
  > --------------------------------
  > Tom Brandt

Now it seems that 'better' opinions are now
inherited and passed down through our genes
to our 'instincts'.

That infers meaning then, that 'other' [not
as good] opinions must be learned or acquired
and not inbred.

It's only a matter of time before those with
'other' opinions are sent to psychiatric wards
because they are diagnosed with an 'unnatural'
opinion or mental disease.

Of course, that's a slippery slope argument.

--
BT
NNNN



Tracy Johnson
Justin Thyme Productions
http://hp3000.empireclassic.com/

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *