On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:05:05 -0600, joe andress <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
>>>The US, UK, France, Germany all have plenty of dirt on their hands from
>dealing with Saddam in the >>past.
>
>I agree with this statement. None are saints.
>Any country that firmly believes that the US has violated a law, treaty or
>agreement so much to the point they wish military action to enforce that
>law, treaty or agreement is well within their rights to do so. I dont think
>that any have done that to date.
>
>Finally, nothing in life is free. Countries which hold out their hand for
>aid have to expect to give something in return. That include Germany.  BTW,
>I have not seen in the media where the USA has firmly stated that they will
>withhold aid to any country.
>

What exactly and for how many years must Germany give something in return?
I thought that Germany is a free democratic country without "big brother".
Maybe I can send an e-mail to the German chancellor that he knows too, what
is expected of him.


Of course the USA would never firmly state such things but how about
reading between the lines? and there are many lines.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/africa/02/26/africa.iraq.ap/
What about all the money for turkey?
I send you earlier an article in the Chicago Sunday-Times but you said,
that it is a liberal paper that doesn't tell the truth.
What newspapers do tell the truth and what truth?
You even send an earlier mail saying, that african votes can always be
bought!!!
Ok, that's not withholding but the same in other terms/words.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *