Isn't this the wrong way round.

As no one has found any nukes (to my knowledge) there are no WMD, so why is
Bush so keen to go to war.



-----Original Message-----
From: Brice Yokem [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 13 March 2003 21:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: French Fries are now Freedom Fries? Bomb Link


What is happening here is people are defining a WMD according to what
fit's their argument.

Those who oppose the pending Iraq war want to call bug spray a WMD.

Those who favor it want to only call Megaton-yeild Nukes a WMD.

I suspect the truth is somewhere in between.

I will say this though, 'Chemical Weapons' are poison not High-Explosive.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

==================================
This message contains confidential information and is intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not
the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
email. Please inform the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail
by mistake and delete this email from your system. Email transmission cannot
be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or be incomplete. The
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in
the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard copy version. No contracts
may be concluded on behalf of Virgin Express SA/NV by means of email
communication. Finally, the recipient should check this e-mail and any
attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability
for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
==================================

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *