Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:22:06 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 2/25/03 8:17:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
> Each of these two good-old-boy clubs picks persons, who are willing to
> do their bidding and who they believe have crowd appeal, as candidates
> for various offices. Primaries are held to choose between each party's
> tweedle-dees and tweedle-dums. The winners from each party then spend
> donated millions in competition for our votes. Then we get to vote
> against the candidates which we feel are the worst by voting for their
> opponents. If we have evaluated perfectly, we wind up, in each case,
> with the lesser of two evils.
>
> The reason we "vote these jerks in" is that we have no other choice.
>
I'd say that you have been reading Libertarian Party campaign material except
of course for your last sentence. I'm quite happy with the people that I
vote for. Just wish that they would get more votes! There are more than 2
choices on most ballots now.
Wayne
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|