Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:02:58 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 03:28 AM, Richard Ali wrote:
>> Bill writes:
>> ...your question of "why now" I say again, the dynamics of our foreign
> policy have shifted radically since 9/11. I would say that Bush ll's
> desire
> to rid Saddam now is a race against time - ...
>
> Granted the shift has happened. From being inward-looking and
> seemingly isolationist to being at the forefront of shaping a new
> world order. This is all very well and if conducted within the
> confines of the UN (flawed but the only one we've got), with adherence
> to international law, with engagement of genuine coalitions and
> respecting differences, then it would have my vote.
Thanks Richard,
If people want wars to improve the world, may I suggest a "War against
Pollution" and a "War against Overpopulation"?
Why did we not participate in those efforts?
FW
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|