Sorry, my spellchecker did a number on me, again. At any rate, you are
correct it was nit-picking.
I agree with you and Fred the first link was not a very good article. The
second one was by far the more interesting one. I will endeavor to do
better.
Denys
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Greg Chaplin
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The peace marches
Picky, picky. I tried to restrain myself (but failed) from being as
nit-picky by pointing out that you repeated the spelling.
Anyway, the 2 links you've got here are just 2 individuals'
opinions. They are NOT reports. The NY Post commentary
in particular was not worth reading at all. If "articles" like
those are the source of your wisdom, then it would explain
your views and comments.
Greg.
>>> "Denys Beauchemin" <[log in to unmask]> 18/02/2003 04:05:57 am >>>
That's "myopic", not myopic.
Here are a few links for you to read:
http://www.nypost.com/commentary/54586.htm
http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=200892003
Denys
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of
Greg Chaplin
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: The peace marches
>>> Denys Beauchemin <[log in to unmask]> 17/02/2003 09:37:59 am >>>
<snip>
... Actually one of the reasons the Socialists support Iraq (witness
the large leftist pro-Saddam demonstrations this weekend,) ...
<snip>
What a blinkered, red-necked, miopic view!!
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
