Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:00:43 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 01:57 PM, Denys Beauchemin wrote:
> I doubt very much there were any rugged individualists marching on
> Saturday,
> they would not want to show any support for Saddam. If there were
> any, they
> were probably looking for autographs from celebrities.
A pointless conjecture except to put down the participants for
expressing their views in a peaceful manner. Denys, that's beneath you.
> BTW, I watched some coverage of these pro-Saddam marches this weekend
> and
> the reason I refer to these marches as being pro-Saddam is that I did
> not
> see a single sign enjoining Saddam to do the right thing. All the
> signs
> were anti-US, anti-Bush or anti-War. The only pro-signs were for the
> failed
> inspections.
Did you expect otherwise? Their purpose was to express their opposition
to a preemptive war and they ,correctly, focused on those they perceive
as proposing that.
By the way, your email arrived without an "OT". Shame. Shame.
FW
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|