HP3000-L Archives

February 2003, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:28:03 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Christian - I heard someone suggest something today on the radio that made
the most sense. It wasn't the tiles - because they have lost tiles before
without catastrophic consequences. The leading edge of the wing has the most
heat during re-entry (obviously) and had a different material from the
tiles.

When the foam - or whatever it was - broke off during liftoff and hit the
wing - that's when the damage occurred. And if that was the case (who knows
right now?) then there wouldn't have been a thing anybody could have done.
Columbia was doomed from the liftoff.

I also heard a couple of other interesting things - (a) some think it began
falling apart over California (400,000 foot altitude - 7:1 glide ratio)  -
which given the speed they were going - was only minutes behind Texas and
(b) a shuttle has a 1 in 200 chance every liftoff of having something
catastrophic happen - that's pretty lousy odds if you ask me...

Bill

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2