Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask] writes: > > > Somebody (Gavin? Jeff?) listed some of the 3rd party stuff in MPE, but > > naturally I can't find it now. I think some of it is pretty fundamental to > > MPE, and just can't be left out without serious consequence. > > > > I agree that some of it might be very fundamental. Can't see why it should > have a high royalty though. MBF's ODBC sw should be very easy to seperate > out [...]40_13Dec200216:14: [log in to unmask] |
Date: | Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:32:16 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
All,
Well, if the purpose of the licensing fee is to recover costs of management,
administration then I believe that a fee of $500 to $1,000 would be in line
with the costs cited by 3rd party HP 3000 software vendors. Unless members
of SIG SoftVend tell us otherwise I suggest that costs up to say $1,500
should be accepted without debate.
Cortlandt Wilson
(650) 966-8555
>-----Original Message-----
>From: OpenMPE Support Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
>VANCE,JEFF (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:11 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: MPE Licensing
>
>
>Hi Cortlandt, and OpenMPE list,
>
>>From my understanding you are correct.
>
> Jeff
>
>> From the figures that you suggest in your example do I assume
>> correctly that
>> you are thinking that HP will want to cover the
>> administration, paperwork
>> and software delivery costs of licensing? In other words
>> the operation
>> will be essentially revenue neutral for HP. How close am I
>> to reflecting your thinking on the matter?
|
|
|