Mark remarks:
> Those "<cu>"-thingies look suspiciously like custom tags. Custom tags
> like..uh..well..XML. Granted, what I saw is not XML because it is not
> well-formed...
The reason for your confusion is that the tags are *not* XML. They are CUML
tags, and according to the published specifications for CUML, they are
perfectly well-formed.
I'm sure that that's true, if for no other reason than I know the author of
the CUML specification reasonably well.
Wirt Atmar
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *