HP3000-L Archives

November 2002, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:40:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Paul Courry wrote:
>
> Our corporate Time Server is a Windows 2000 box which by default runs SNTP
> (Simple Network Time Protocol).
>
> Can (and should) I use this Windows 2000 server as my time source or should I
> punch through the firewall on port 123 to get an outside time source?
>
> The application is a simple Warehouse Management System. Accuracy to 1 second
> is plenty good.
>
> My concern is that I think the two protocols are incompatible (thank you M$)
> and that I need to find a time server running full blown NTP in order to
> succeed.

NTP is adaptive and mature, while SNTP is essentially doing an NTPDATE
periodically to synchronize against an NTP source.

Suggest you take one reliable, full-blown NTP machine, have it synch to
a few outside sources, and then synch everything else to it (via NTP,
NTPDATE, or SNTP).

Jeff

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2