Hi Mark :)
   um.... I ain't no lawyer type... and don't even play one on tv!  but....

   It would seem that the language (I snipped the rest) shown below refers
only to your being quiet about how you settled this matter... ie what
amount of money changed hands and such.... so it would seem that you can
discuss Interland but not how you concluded this one document....

   In fact if Interland were to prevent you talking about them it would
prevent them from using one of the best forms of advertising... ie "word of
mouth".  I guess in the case of Interland that they may not gain anything
because their service is horrible... :) hehe

   Note... I noticed that the agreement is governed by the laws of
Georgia... so there may also be some recourse under their state laws...
Oregon has some "consumer friendly" laws providing recourse when there is a
problem... I don't know.... I lived on a Army base when I lived in
Georgia...

Art "just a ramblin' or two :) hehe" Bahrs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Wonsil" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:23 AM
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Just another Interland vent


<<<< snip >>>>

Customer agrees to keep secret and confidential the terms of this
Settlement Agreement, both specifically and in general, and to make no
statement containing any qualitative or descriptive terms or terms that
state or suggest that this Settlement Agreement was favorable to either
party, and agrees that Customer's only comment with respect to this
settlement will be that the matter was settled and all claims have been
dismissed, except that Customer may disclose information about the
settlement as needed to accountants in connection with tax reporting or as
validly required by a court or administrative body.

<<<< snip >>>>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *