HP3000-L Archives

October 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Campbell, Elizabeth" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Campbell, Elizabeth
Date:
Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:51:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Well they didn't make the 100 best companies to work for list and reading the criteria that Fortune used you can probably guess why:

BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR
America's Top Employers
It's not easy being good these days, at least if you're an employer. Suffering through the recession, American businesses have cut back on everything, which means they've slashed perks and fired lots of workers. In this dark time of cuts and layoffs, what makes a company fit for FORTUNE's list of the 100 Best Companies to Work For? We gave companies credit for coming up with creative ways to keep employees satisfied, and for offering generous severance and compassion when they had to make cuts. These companies also rose to the occasion following the tragedy of Sept.11, and that is what being one of 100 Best is all about.

http://www.fortune.com/lists/bestcompanies/index_alpha.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Denys Beauchemin [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT Top of the heap

Well, go to wwww.fortune500.com and see that HP is 28th.  But I think that
list is a little old, Enron is #5.  :)


Denys...

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2