At 09:02 AM 10/4/2002, Wayne R. Boyer wrote:
>In a message dated 10/3/02 10:48:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
> > One would have to go to some lengths to use a double-
> > byte encoding in COBOL....
>
>Unicode support would be an awfully nice enhancement to COBOL.... how about
>in COBOL-2010? Sure would be nice if the language standards process moved a
>little faster as well.
At SIGCOBOL last week we were told that they are shooting for updates every
5 years now.
>Wayne Boyer
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
Regards,
Shawn Gordon
President
theKompany.com
www.thekompany.com
949-713-3276
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *