Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:02:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 07:13 PM 7/22/02 -0600, Rene Woc wrote:
>At 7:42 PM -0500 7/22/02, you wrote:
>
>>Leaving my argument about tape subsystem technology with Stan aside for a
>>minute, the TC file is filecode -430. I am rather surprised that Adager did
>>not copy it. If it did not, it probably had a reason not to. For the newly
>>copied database, what does a DBUTIL SHOW MYDB ALL reveal about the
>>attachment? If it does not complain, perhaps it was not attached at the
>>time of the copy and therefore the TC was left behind as an extraneous file.
>
>Adager database copies are not attached to SQL DBEs even though the
>source database may be.
DBGeneral is the same... The user can use another DBGeneral option to
create a command file containing SQL attach information along with
SQL views and re-attach the copied base to a DBE as desired.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|