SCUBA-SE Archives

June 2002

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Strike <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:55:34 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:11 PM, Reef Fish wrote:

Jeff wrote:
> >> I personally prefer to use 1.4 ppO2, stay at least
> >> 10fsw above the MOD, and follow plain air NDL (a little flexible on the
> >> last one).

I wrote:
> >I'm with you!  :-)

> Probably not when he tried to follow da Feeesh down to 197 fsw and
> got a bit narked on the way.   :-)

'a bit narked'?  Mate!  I'd have been off the planet at that depth on air,
even allowing time to work up to it - as I seem to be one of those folks who
are susceptible, (or at least notice the effects of narcosis) - over a
period of days!  :-)

> You folks are back to the 131 fsw and YOU DIE mentality of PADI.

Not at all! :-)

I believe absolutely in the saying, "know your limitations - and the
personal limitations of the breathing medium - and dive within them."  :-)

> Watch my lips, as Sen(i)or Bush might say, "It's the EXPOSURE TIME
> that matters much more than the absolute PPO2 number".  :-)

Granted!  (Although I'd tend to say that both are equally important)  But
why not give oneself an 'edge' by reigning in both?  Particularly where
recreational diving's concerned. :-)))

Strike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2