Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:55:34 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:11 PM, Reef Fish wrote:
Jeff wrote:
> >> I personally prefer to use 1.4 ppO2, stay at least
> >> 10fsw above the MOD, and follow plain air NDL (a little flexible on the
> >> last one).
I wrote:
> >I'm with you! :-)
> Probably not when he tried to follow da Feeesh down to 197 fsw and
> got a bit narked on the way. :-)
'a bit narked'? Mate! I'd have been off the planet at that depth on air,
even allowing time to work up to it - as I seem to be one of those folks who
are susceptible, (or at least notice the effects of narcosis) - over a
period of days! :-)
> You folks are back to the 131 fsw and YOU DIE mentality of PADI.
Not at all! :-)
I believe absolutely in the saying, "know your limitations - and the
personal limitations of the breathing medium - and dive within them." :-)
> Watch my lips, as Sen(i)or Bush might say, "It's the EXPOSURE TIME
> that matters much more than the absolute PPO2 number". :-)
Granted! (Although I'd tend to say that both are equally important) But
why not give oneself an 'edge' by reigning in both? Particularly where
recreational diving's concerned. :-)))
Strike
|
|
|