LISTSERV - HP3000-L Archives

HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HP3000-L Home
	HP3000-L May 2002, Week 5

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Contractors' Responsibilities in this New Age?
From:	Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2002 12:36:56 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (34 lines)

The point being Stable vs. Unstable  or  HPe3000 vs. Microsoft

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Contractors' Responsibilities in this New Age?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Baier [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Contractors' Responsibilities in this New Age?
>
>
> That's what I call a monopoly. Not only tell us the software
> to us but also
> the hardware. M$ might already be the biggest shareholder of
> Intel and AMD.
>

So it is ok that HP had total control of the 3000 Hardware and OS, but for
Microsoft not to restrict anything but to simply list the hardware it has
tested and found to work is a monopoly?

You lost me.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

RAVEN.UTC.EDU