HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OT: Supreme Court to hear Cross Burning Case
From:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 May 2002 08:49:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
On Thu, 30 May 2002 18:56:09 EDT, Wayne R. Boyer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>In a message dated 5/30/02 10:25:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
>> California's law was much narrower and said only cross
>> burning specifically targeted at individuals, such as burning on their
>> private property, was an intimidation crime
>
>Actually I think that if someone burned a cross on my front 'lawn' (weed
>patch) it would qualify as arson or attempted arson.  Last I heard, that
was
>a major felony here in CA.
>

My wife told me, that down here in the South on my property (outside
city-limits) it would be trespassing and I could shoot those individuals.
That makes much more sense.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2