HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OT: Supreme Court to hear Cross Burning Case
From:
"Wayne R. Boyer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 30 May 2002 18:56:09 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
In a message dated 5/30/02 10:25:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> California's law was much narrower and said only cross
> burning specifically targeted at individuals, such as burning on their
> private property, was an intimidation crime

Actually I think that if someone burned a cross on my front 'lawn' (weed
patch) it would qualify as arson or attempted arson.  Last I heard, that was
a major felony here in CA.

Wayne Boyer

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2