The way I see it, Mikes suggestion is the way to go.
Besides, if anyone thinks s/he will miss some emails, s/he can always check with
comp.sys.hp.mpe.
This is only my opinion,
Olav Kappert.
IOMIT International (HP Application Development Specialist)
Frank Gribbin wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> If the "filtered" messages could be reviewed, there would be little chance
> of losing anything. Either way, the filters suggested so far are OK with
> me. Thank you for taking the time to address this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank J. Gribbin
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2002 13:49:39 -0500, Michael L Gueterman
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> > Since Gavin brought it up...
> >
> > Although I'm against performing any filtering at the gateway, I will
> >make some adjustments to the code *if* that is really what the majority
> >of people want. As I don't have the web-ballot code handy (I know
> >its around here somewhere) just email me with a yes/no answer and
> >I'll let you know the outcome in a day or two. So:
> >
> >Yes = Implement a filter on the gateway
> >No = Do not implement a filter on the gateway.
> >
> >{hmm, maybe its time to put advertising headers and footers in
> >there too! ;)
> >
> >Regards,
> >Michael L Gueterman
> >Easy Does It Technologies LLC
> >http://www.editcorp.com
> >voice: 888.858.EDIT or 573.368.5478
> >fax: 573.368.5479
> >--
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> >Behalf Of Wirt Atmar
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:30 PM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] SKC Morphs Again... We're Now SKHPC
> >
> >
> >Jim writes:
> >
> >> Has anyone else noticed that the civility quotient on this list has
> >dropped
> >> precipitously in the last few days?
> >>
> >> All those in favor of creating a closed list server, please raise your
> >> hands.
> >
> >It isn't necessary to cut the link to comp.sys.hp.mpe. There are some
> people
> >who would not only object but actually depend on the comp.sys.hp.mpe
> >newsgroup, as Roy Brown noted. The problem, as I apparently tried too
> subtly
> >to point out earlier, is being derived from those people who post to
> >multiple
> >newsgroups over on the newsgroup side of things.
> >
> >Terry Shannon, of Shannon Knows Jack, originally posted his note to four
> >newsgroups. Anyone on any one of those newsgroups who responds to those
> >messages automatically reposts their messages to all four newsgroups, one
> of
> >which is comp.sys.hp.mpe, which cause it to eventually arrive on HP3000-L.
> >
> >My suggestion is, a bit more explicitly stated this time, is that any
> >posting
> >that arrives on comp.sys.hp.mpe that has multiple newsgroups in its headers
> >not be gated over to HP3000-L. It that were true, we wouldn't be seeing any
> >of this nonsense.
> >
> >Wirt Atmar
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
