Hi Mike,
If the "filtered" messages could be reviewed, there would be little chance
of losing anything. Either way, the filters suggested so far are OK with
me. Thank you for taking the time to address this.
Regards,
Frank J. Gribbin
On Wed, 8 May 2002 13:49:39 -0500, Michael L Gueterman
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
> Since Gavin brought it up...
>
> Although I'm against performing any filtering at the gateway, I will
>make some adjustments to the code *if* that is really what the majority
>of people want. As I don't have the web-ballot code handy (I know
>its around here somewhere) just email me with a yes/no answer and
>I'll let you know the outcome in a day or two. So:
>
>Yes = Implement a filter on the gateway
>No = Do not implement a filter on the gateway.
>
>{hmm, maybe its time to put advertising headers and footers in
>there too! ;)
>
>Regards,
>Michael L Gueterman
>Easy Does It Technologies LLC
>http://www.editcorp.com
>voice: 888.858.EDIT or 573.368.5478
>fax: 573.368.5479
>--
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
>Behalf Of Wirt Atmar
>Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:30 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] SKC Morphs Again... We're Now SKHPC
>
>
>Jim writes:
>
>> Has anyone else noticed that the civility quotient on this list has
>dropped
>> precipitously in the last few days?
>>
>> All those in favor of creating a closed list server, please raise your
>> hands.
>
>It isn't necessary to cut the link to comp.sys.hp.mpe. There are some
people
>who would not only object but actually depend on the comp.sys.hp.mpe
>newsgroup, as Roy Brown noted. The problem, as I apparently tried too
subtly
>to point out earlier, is being derived from those people who post to
>multiple
>newsgroups over on the newsgroup side of things.
>
>Terry Shannon, of Shannon Knows Jack, originally posted his note to four
>newsgroups. Anyone on any one of those newsgroups who responds to those
>messages automatically reposts their messages to all four newsgroups, one
of
>which is comp.sys.hp.mpe, which cause it to eventually arrive on HP3000-L.
>
>My suggestion is, a bit more explicitly stated this time, is that any
>posting
>that arrives on comp.sys.hp.mpe that has multiple newsgroups in its headers
>not be gated over to HP3000-L. It that were true, we wouldn't be seeing any
>of this nonsense.
>
>Wirt Atmar
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
