Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:02:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Telnet has a line mode that stores and echos characters locally
until a CR is entered, then sends the whole line. This mode is
supported by WRQ's Reflection. See RFC 854 at
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc854.html for more details.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Appel [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: VT-MGR vs. Telnet
>
>
> Craig,
>
> >I tried searching the archives and they don't seem to be responding.
>
> Well, if Raven doesn't work, you can always try
> http://groups.google.com :)
>
>
> >My question is which is the more efficient protocol?
>
> It depends. In addition to what James Hofmeister already replied, you
> might also want to keep in mind that there is a difference in XCONTRAP
> handling that can make Telnet sessions work faster than VT-MGR (NS/VT)
> sessions in some situations (e.g. large shell scripts).
>
> Lars.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|