HP3000-L Archives

April 2002, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"PAUL,GUY (HP-Boise,ex1)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PAUL,GUY (HP-Boise,ex1)
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:47:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Since all HP employees received this memo first hand we can all
attest that there was something lost in the translation.

The actual statement (that I have right in from of me) is
 "to the fullest extent of HP policy".

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wonsil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 21:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: HP exec feels 'violated' by voice-mail leak


From ComputerWorld:

http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO70061,00.html

"Not only do I feel personally violated, but it is illegal and damaging to
the company and your fellow employees," Wayman wrote. "We are vigorously
investigating this breach along with others that have occurred in recent
weeks and we intend to prosecute these matters to the fullest extent of HP
police and applicable law."

This *must* be a typo.  The HP police?  I can't believe that.

Even so, am I to understand the message: No dissent in the boardroom?  No
dissent in the lunchroom?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2