"John R. Wolff" <[log in to unmask]> wrote
> What fascinated me was that this user seemed to think that a
"guarantee"
> from a pre-merged Compaq would carry more weight than no Guarantee
from a
> pre-merged HP. Wouldn't it seem obvious that all bets are off after
the
> merger and that such "guarantees" are not guaranteed by new
management?
I'm definitely no lawyer, but I do not see how a merger could undo a
previous legal committment made by one of the parties.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *