Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:59:56 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
why did I choose this line of work?
I am always told to act and work like a professional and then
others make decision for me and in my name (without asking me),
others know what is best for me (without asking me or telling me how they
know and I don't)
I feel like an infant.
It is like comunism. Others think and talk for me. And they take my money
of course too.
All in my best interest.
Michael
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:42:45 -0800, John Clogg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I agree. What makes this especially disturbing is the implicit notion that
>Interex's board is speaking for the organization and its members. As an
>Interex member, I don't recall being asked whether I support the merger.
>Board members, If my memory is faulty please correct me.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Burke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
>
>Interex, the ... "independent organization of IT leaders..." won't say
>anything about HP EOL'ing the HP 3000 for fear up upsetting their
>relationship with HP, but will come out in support of the merger and
>management's position even though they have no special expertise in
>evaluating the merits of the merger. Interex would do better to spend their
>resources on member services and leave the financial politics to others.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|