HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: mF vs Acu COBOL?
From:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:37:06 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
Wayne writes:

> What do you want to see in a COBOL compiler?  I haven't
> worked extensively
> with it yet but I've been reasonably impressed by Acucorp's AcuCOBOL.

How about:

1. Native compilation.
2. No run-time costs per simultaneous execution of cobol code.
3. Reasonable compiler costs and ongoing maintenance.
4. Vendor committed to cobol.
5. Support of multi-platforms (hp-ux, linux for example) with multiple
   chips (pa-risc, ia-32, ia-64)

duane

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2