"Tom of Bunyon" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:pzVh8.6814$Nn6.616107@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com...
> Wouldn't it be something if the HP shareholders approved the deal BUT the
> Compaq shareholders rejected it because HP failed to advertise the deal to
> them?
>
More likely that CPQ would be guilty of such marketing malfeasance. That
said, there doesn't seem to be an abundance of opposition on the CPQ side of
the deal. Whether CPQ stockholder support or opposition is a moot point on
March 20 remains to be seen.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *