SCUBA-SE Archives

March 2002

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Timothy Doty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:17:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
                    Reef Fish
                    <large_nassau_grouper@       To:     [log in to unmask]
                    YAHOO.COM>                   cc:
                    Sent by: SouthEast US        Subject:     Re: [SCUBA-SE] Sun Dancer NEDfest with
                    Scuba Diving Travel           Peter & Alice Hughes and              Bret
                    list                          Gilliam, anyone?
                    <[log in to unmask]
                    U>


                    03/11/2002 09:50 PM
                    Please respond to
                    SouthEast US Scuba
                    Diving Travel list









Is this a SCUBA list?

Don't see alot of SCUBA content............

On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 09:33:28 -0500, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> Who's "he"?   Should it matter or in any way affect what *I* have
>> to say, on this or other subjects?
>
>"He" is the person you chose to insult for his posts in another forum.

If you call that an insult, then it's the SAME insult I have posted (in
reply to HIM) in the other forum, rec.scuba.  Why do we need YOU to drag
him over here?


>"He"
>is the person you chose to insult in a forum that he does not normally
>post to.

So?  I told him MUCH MORE in my reply to him (all deja vu).  Furthermore,
I told HIM that there wasn't anything I said ABOUT him that I hadn't
said TO him already (and he had already responded in rec.scuba)!

So why do we need YOU spying and poking your nose in?  I said things
about George Irvine, in the SAME thread, and in my reply to Dan too,
(again, all deja vu to George, because I had said it to HIM, in much
stronger language).

So why didn't YOU cc to George what I posted here?

Don't be an arsehole all your life, Lee.  Take a day off!!



>"He" is the person whose name was on the CC line of the message you
>responded to.

Why couldn't it be YOUR meddling in his quarrel with Bret Gilliam?



> "He" is the person who has since responded to your insults.

And I have responded to his post.  Why hadn't he followed up with that
post or the post of Mike Wallace?

Lee, just exactly WHAT did you hope to accomplish by dragging Dan Volker
here, and exactly WHAT have you accomplished by dragging Dan Volker here
other than an encore in making an ass of yourself?


You have descended to an officious, trouble-seeking-and-meddling spy
from what everything George said about you that were right on target!

> He does make an extreme effort to make
> idiocy sound reasonable, but via his normal method: bullshit, lies,
> fabrications, and twisted "facts". This guy is rapidly gaining on
> the "Village Idiot" title

Why don't you just try to mind YOUR OWN business?

-- Bob.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2